**Overview**

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is the principal tool for performing Bayesian inference. MCMC is a stochastic procedure that utilizes Markov chains simulated from the posterior distribution of model parameters to compute posterior summaries and make predictions. Given its stochastic nature and dependence on initial values, verifying Markov chain convergence can be difficultâ€”visual inspection of the trace and autocorrelation plots are often used. A more formal method for checking convergence relies on simulating and comparing results from multiple Markov chains; see, for example, Gelman and Rubin (1992) and Gelman et al. (2013). Using multiple chains, rather than a single chain, makes diagnosing convergence easier.

As of Stata 16, **bayesmh** and its *bayes* prefix commands support a new option, **nchains()**, for simulating multiple Markov chains. There is also a new convergence diagnostic command, **bayesstats grubin**. All Bayesian postestimation commands now support multiple chains. In this blog post, I show you how to check MCMC convergence and improve your Bayesian inference using multiple chains through a series of examples. I also show you how to speed up your sampling by running multiple Markov chains in parallel. Read more…

__Why use lasso to do inference about coefficients in high-dimensional models?__

High-dimensional models, which have too many potential covariates for the sample size at hand, are increasingly common in applied research. The lasso, discussed in the previous post, can be used to estimate the coefficients of interest in a high-dimensional model. This post discusses commands in Stata 16 that estimate the coefficients of interest in a high-dimensional model. Read more…

__Why is the lasso interesting?__

The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) estimates model coefficients and these estimates can be used to select which covariates should be included in a model. The lasso is used for outcome prediction and for inference about causal parameters. In this post, we provide an introduction to the lasso and discuss using the lasso for prediction. In the next post, we discuss using the lasso for inference about causal parameters. Read more…

I have a confession. I wasn’t excited about the addition of **frames** to Stata 16. Yes, **frames** has been one of the most requested features for many years, and our website analytics show that **frames** is wildly popular. Adding **frames** was a smart decision and our customers are excited. But I have used Stata for over 20 years, and I have been perfectly happy using one dataset at a time. So I ignored **frames**.

Then I started working on an example for lasso using genetic data. I simulated patient data along with genetic data for each of 22 chromosomes saved in 22 separate datasets. Working with 23 datasets became cumbersome, so I thought I’d check out **frames**. I began by reading the manual and then tinkered with my genetic data. Along the way, I discovered a feature of **frames** that completely blew my mind. I’m going to show you that feature below, and I expect that it will blow your mind as well.

This blog post is not meant to be an introduction to **frames**. There is a detailed introduction to frames in the Stata 16 manual that will make you an expert. I simply want to show you some of the useful things that you can do with **frames**, including the following: Read more…

In my last three posts, I showed you how to calculate power for a *t* test using Monte Carlo simulations, how to integrate your simulations into Stata’s **power** command, and how to do this for linear and logistic regression models. In today’s post, I’m going to show you how to estimate power for multilevel/longitudinal models using simulations. You may want to review my earlier post titled “How to simulate multilevel/longitudinal data” before you read this post. Read more…

In my last two posts, I showed you how to calculate power for a *t* test using Monte Carlo simulations and how to integrate your simulations into Stata’s **power** command. In today’s post, I’m going to show you how to do these tasks for linear and logistic regression models. The strategy and overall structure of the programs for linear and logistic regression are similar to the *t* test examples. The parts that will change are the simulation of the data and the models used to test the null hypothesis. Read more…

In my last post, I showed you how to calculate power for a *t* test using Monte Carlo simulations. In this post, I will show you how to integrate your simulations into Stata’s **power** command so that you can easily create custom tables and graphs for a range of parameter values. Read more…

Power and sample-size calculations are an important part of planning a scientific study. You can use Stata’s **power** commands to calculate power and sample-size requirements for dozens of commonly used statistical tests. But there are no simple formulas for more complex models such as multilevel/longitudinal models and structural equation models (SEMs). Monte Carlo simulations are one way to calculate power and sample-size requirements for complex models, and Stata provides all the tools you need to do this. You can even integrate your simulations into Stata’s **power** commands so that you can easily create custom tables and graphs for a range of parameter values. Read more…

In his blog post, Enrique Pinzon discussed how to perform regression when we don’t want to make any assumptions about functional formâ€”use the **npregress** command. He concluded by asking and answering a few questions about the results using the **margins** and **marginsplot** commands.

Recently, I have been thinking about all the different types of questions that we could answer using **margins** after nonparametric regression, or really after any type of regression. **margins** and **marginsplot** are powerful tools for exploring the results of a model and drawing many kinds of inferences. In this post, I will show you how to ask and answer very specific questions and how to explore the entire response surface based on the results of your nonparametric regression.

Read more…

**What are DSGE models?**

Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models are used by macroeconomists to model multiple time series. A DSGE model is based on economic theory. A theory will have equations for how individuals or sectors in the economy behave and how the sectors interact. What emerges is a system of equations whose parameters can be linked back to the decisions of economic actors. In many economic theories, individuals take actions based partly on the values they expect variables to take in the future, not just on the values those variables take in the current period. The strength of DSGE models is that they incorporate these expectations explicitly, unlike other models of multiple time series.

DSGE models are often used in the analysis of shocks or counterfactuals. A researcher might subject the model economy to an unexpected change in policy or the environment and see how variables respond. For example, what is the effect of an unexpected rise in interest rates on output? Or a researcher might compare the responses of economic variables with different policy regimes. For example, a model might be used to compare outcomes under a high-tax versus a low-tax regime. A researcher would explore the behavior of the model under different settings for tax rate parameters, holding other parameters constant.

In this post, I show you how to estimate the parameters of a DSGE model, how to create and interpret an impulse response, and how to compare the impulse response estimated from the data with an impulse response generated by a counterfactual policy regime. Read more…